Main Page
From WikiSophia
[edit] Tags
Liberalism Absolutism Nationalism Violence Democracy Agnosticism Stigmergy Anarchism public-unrest Atheism Idealism Fanatism Socialism Power of the WEB Criticism Altruism right to life Animal rights Anthropocentrism Artificial-intelligence Atheism Autonomy Cosmology Quantum-TheoryBioethics Biopoiesis Black-holes Business-ethicsCapitalismReligion Fanticism Civilization Cloning Cognitive-ScienceCognitive-THerapy Neo-SocialismConsequentialismDaoim (Taoism)DeontologyEducationMarxism Informal-Logic Herder Cosmopolitanism Globalization
[edit] Contents
1. About
a. Criteria for inclusion in WikiSophia
[edit] About
WikiSophia's articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in reliable, published sources are covered (see WikiSophia:Neutral point of view). The word "source" as used on WikiSophia has three related meanings: the piece of work itself (the article, book), the creator of the work (the writer, journalist), and the publisher of the work (The New York Times, Cambridge University Press, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). All three can affect reliability. Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both. The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article, and should be appropriate to the claims made. If a topic has no reliable sources, WikiSophia should not have an article on it. The aim of WikiSophia is not so much to inform as it is to suggest, thus, it is essential that all articles offer a new point of view.
